Legal Opinion

Gordon v. Sprott

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 1, 1950No. 98PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWinborne, J.

The assignments of error presented on this appeal pivot on the exceptions to the rulings of the trial court in denying defendants’ motions, aptly made, for judgment as of nonsuit. If it be conceded that there is sufficient evidence to support a finding by the jury that defendants were negligent in the respects alleged, it is clear that, as a matter of law, upon plaintiff’s own testimony, she was guilty of negligence which was at least a proximate cause of the injury of which she complains. If a plaintiff’s negligence is one of the proximate causes of the injury, it is sufficient to defeat…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Tyson v. . FordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. Dunnevant v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  3. Mulford v. Cotton States Hotel Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  4. Parkway Bus Co. v. Coble Dairy Products Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  5. Groome v. City of StatesvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Dennis v. City of AlbemarleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. Carolina Scenic Stages v. LowtherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Cook v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  4. Crane v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  5. Godwin v. Johnson Cotton Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API