Legal Opinion

Crane v. Caldwell

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 18, 1994No. 9225SC1312PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

The sole question presented by this appeal is whether the trial court erred in granting defendant’s motion for a directed verdict. Issues arising in negligence cases are ordinarily not susceptible to summary adjudication because it is generally for the jury to apply the apposite standard of care. Taylor v. Walker, 320 N.C. 729, 360 S.E.2d 796 (1987); Williams v. Power & Light Co., 296 N.C. 400, 250 S.E.2d 255 (1979). A motion by the defendant for a directed verdict pursuant to G.S. § 1A-1, Rule 50(a) tests the legal sufficiency of the evidence to take the case to the jury and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Manganello v. Permastone, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. Williams v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Taylor v. WalkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  4. Freese v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  5. Pafford v. . Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Nelson v. FreelandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  2. Jay Group, Ltd. v. GlasgowCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  3. Sawyer v. Food Lion, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  4. Smith v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  5. Gregory v. KilbrideCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API