State ex rel. Johns v. Board of County Commrs.

By filing a motion for judgment on the pleadings, relator admitted, for purposes of the motion, the truth of all relevant and well-pleaded allegations in the answer. In sustaining that motion, the court below neees-*7sarily viewed the answer in the same light. Vest v. Kramer (1952), 158 Ohio St. 78, 107 N. E. 2d 105; see, also, Ornella v. Robertson (1968), 14 Ohio St. 2d 144, 237 N. E. 2d 140; Ex parte Province (1933), 127 Ohio St. 333, 188 N. E. 550; State, ex rel. Turner, v. Bremen (1927), 117 Ohio St. 186, 158 N. E. 6.

In their answer, respondents alleged that “Richland Connty, Ohio is…