Legal Opinion

Ornella v. Robertson

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1968No. 41152PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

As is demonstrated by remarks set forth in the statement of this case made by counsel for plaintiffs during his opening statement, plaintiff, Beatrice Ornella, executed a left turn at a point in a highway divided into two roadways by angled concrete dividers.

Section 4511.35, Revised Code, provides in full text, as follows:

“Whenever any highway has been divided into two roadways by an intervening space, or by a physical barrier, or clearly indicated dividing section so constructed as to impede vehicular traffic, every vehicle shall be driven only upon the right-hand roadway, and no vehicle…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schell v. DuBoisOhio Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Swoboda v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Bush v. Harvey Transfer Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1946

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Sikora v. WenzelOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Hake v. George Wiedemann Brewing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Mann v. Northgate Investors, L.L.C.Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Jaworowski v. Medical Radiation ConsultantsOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Jackovic v. WebbOhio Court of Appeals · 2013

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API