Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Brown v. Board of County Commrs.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1970No. 69-286PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, J.

In view of the fact that the amount requested to be appropriated for the fiscal year 1969 has been appropriated by respondent, the relief sought in the petition is now limited to the deficit in the Public Assistance Fund for the fiscal year 1968, i.e., $351,049.81.

Thus, the question presented is whether the relator, under Section 5101.161, Eevised Code, can compel the respondent to appropriate funds for the purpose of making up the deficit in the Public Assistance Fund for the year 1968.

Section 5101.161, Eevised Code, provides, in part:

“* * * beginning of the fiscal year the board of county…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Mettler v. StrattonOhio Supreme Court · 1941
  2. State Ex Rel. Masters v. BeamerOhio Supreme Court · 1923
  3. State Ex Rel. City of Middletown v. City Commission of MiddletownOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  4. State Ex Rel. Motter v. AtkinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1945

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Maloney v. SherlockOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State, Ex Rel. Doe v. TracyOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. State ex rel. Weaver v. Lake County Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State ex rel. Newell v. Cuyahoga County Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State ex rel. Newell v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API