Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State ex rel. Milligan v. Freeman

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1972No. 71-665Published

1ConcurrenceSchneider, J.

I concur for the additional reason that respondents do not claim: (1) that they do not have unencumbered funds sufficient to meet the demand of relators; (2) that the performance of their duty is impossible (State, ex rel. Johns, v. Bd. of County Commrs. [1972], 29 Ohio St. 2d 6); or (3) that their performance of duty would entail a collapse of county government (State, ex rel. Brown, v. Bd. of County Commrs. [1970], 21 Ohio St. 2d 62).

Furthermore, respondents do not contend that the care, detention and rehabilitation of juvenile delinquents is not an exercise of judicial power and that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Brown v. Board of County Commrs.Ohio Supreme Court · 1970
  2. State ex rel. Johns v. Board of County Commrs.Ohio Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API