Legal Opinion
City of Big Spring v. Tate
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided May 1, 1942No. 2253PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
LESLIE, Chief Justice.
M. II. Tate instituted this suit against the City of Big Spring to cancel a reassessment certificate issued by said City, and to remove cloud from his title caused thereby. The City filed a cross-action seeking judgment upon such reassessment certificate and foreclosure of paving lien. A trial resulted in a judgment in favor of Tate and the City appeals.
No findings of fact or conclusions of law were requested by either party and none were filed.
Appellant admits that the testimony shows the premises constituted the homestead of Tate at time assessment ordinance was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- West Texas Const. Co. v. DossCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
- O'Connor v. KochCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895
- City of Fort Worth v. RosenTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
- City of Ft. Worth Ex Rel. Roach-Manigan Paving Co. v. RosenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
- Murray v. ReaganTexas Supreme Court · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kidd v. City of Big SpringCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942