City of Fort Worth v. Rosen
Texas Commission of Appeals
Error to Court of Civil Appeals of Second Supreme Judicial District. Suit by the City of Fort Worth and others against Sam Rosen. From a judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals (203 S. W. 84) affirming a judgment for defendant, plaintiffs bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtSadler, P. J.
An understanding of this record, as well as the decision of the questions involved, is fraught with difficulty. Neither from the pleadings nor from the statement of facts are the issues clearly presented.
December 12, 1911, the board of commissioners for the city of Fort Worth, in pursuance of its charter, provided for the pavement of North Twenty-First street from Main to Canal avenue. The city entered into a contract with Roach-Manigan Paving Company to do the work, after having assessed the cost of the entire improvement.
We gather from the record that Rosen owned two pieces of property…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Clark v. HillsTexas Supreme Court · 1886
- San Antonio Real Estate Building & Loan Ass'n v. StewartTexas Supreme Court · 1901
- Moody's Heirs v. MoellerTexas Supreme Court · 1889
- Heirs of John Rogers v. WatsonTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- City of Ft. Worth Ex Rel. Roach-Manigan Paving Co. v. RosenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- City of Gainesville v. HarderTexas Supreme Court · 1942
- Perkins v. SwainIdaho Supreme Court · 1922
- Marburger v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Real Estate Land Title & Trust Co. v. BeryleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Bauer v. Texas Pac. Coal & Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1936
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.