Legal Opinion

Kidd v. City of Big Spring

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 18, 1942No. 2283Published

1Opinion of the Court

LESLIE, Chief Justice.

The City of Big Spring instituted this stiit against C. R. Balch et al. to enforce the obligations of a paving assessment. Defendants denied liability. The trial was before the court without a jury. A personal judgment was rendered against Kidd and a judgment foreclosing the lien against him and Balch.

The court filed findings of fact and conclusions of law. Defendants appeal and Balch alone files briefs, presenting five propositions of law against the validity of the judgment.

Big Spring is a Home Rule city, making such public improvements under the terms and provisions…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Uvalde Construction Co. v. JoinerTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Evans v. WhickerTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Copellar v. O. L. Crigler Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  4. City of Big Spring v. TateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API