Legal Opinion

MacK v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 7, 1996No. 95-653PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

673 So.2d 100 (1996)

Patricia MACK, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Appellant,

v.

BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB CO. and Mead Johnson & Co., Appellees.

No. 95-653.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 7, 1996.

DeWitt M. Lovelace, Destin; Michael D. Hausfeld, Daniel A. Small and Lillian S. Hagen of Cohen, Milstein, Hausfeld & Toll, Washington, DC; Samuel D. Heins, Daniel E. Gustafson and Kent M. Williams of Heins Mills & Olson, P.L.C., Minneapolis, MN; Howard J. Sedran and Johnathan Shub of Levin, Fishbein, Sedran & Berman, Philadelphia, PA; Don Barrett, Lexington,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Blue Shield of Va. v. McCreadySupreme Court of the United States · 1982

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. In re Broiler Chicken Antitrust Litig.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2017
  2. In re Wellbutrin XL Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Elkins v. Microsoft Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2002
  4. Robin Free and Renee Free v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Inc., and Mead Johnson & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  5. In re Relafen Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API