Legal Opinion

Robin Free and Renee Free v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Inc., and Mead Johnson & Company

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 19, 1999No. 97-31341PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge:

In this second appeal generated by an antitrust class action against baby-formula manufacturers, appellants renew their argument that the district court’s exercise of diversity jurisdiction was improper because their claims did not satisfy the amount in controversy requirement of 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (1993). They alternatively contend that the district court erred in ruling that Louisiana antitrust law denied them standing due to their status as indirect purchasers. Since the precise issue of jurisdiction was decided by this court before, the law of the case prevents…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Caterpillar Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Lashawn A. v. Marion S. Barry, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  5. In Re Brand Name Prescription Drugs Antitrust Litigation. Appeals of Robert A. HugginsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Giles v. NYLCare Health Plans, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  2. Patterson v. Mobil Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
  3. Bishop v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
  4. Palasota v. Haggar Clothing Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  5. Merriman v. Crompton Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2006

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API