State v. Printz

SWANSTROM, Judge.

A jury found Mark Printz guilty of delivery of a controlled substance, cocaine. Printz has appealed from the judgment of conviction. The issues are whether the district court committed reversible error in sustaining an objection to defense counsel’s closing argument and whether the court erred in denying Printz’ motion for judgment of acquittal. We affirm.

CLOSING ARGUMENT

Prior to trial, the district court granted in part Printz’ motion to suppress evidence seized during a search of his home and shop building. The suppressed evidence consisted of marked currency and…