Legal Opinion

State v. Hamilton

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided January 14, 1997No. 21158PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PERRY, Judge.

Janet Hamilton appeals from the judgment of conviction and sentence of ten years, with a minimum period of confinement of three years, which was imposed after a jury found her guilty of embezzlement and forgery. I.C. Sections 18-2403(2)(b), 18-2407(l)(b). Hamilton argues that because of a lack of substantial competent evidence, the jury verdict should be reversed. She contends that there was error in the jury instructions which denied her a fair trial. Hamilton also challenges the length of her sentence and the validity of the court-ordered restitution, arguing that the debt…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. ToohillIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Kelly v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. State v. BrownIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. BowmanIdaho Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. State v. GleasonIdaho Supreme Court · 1992

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. State v. BabbIdaho Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. State v. HoyleIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. LombardIdaho Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. State v. Jerry Allan HillIdaho Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. State v. Randell BlakeSupreme Court of Vermont · 2017

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API