Legal Opinion

State v. Erwin

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1977No. 12167PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BISTLINE, Justice.

The sole question presented on this appeal is whether the evidence as a matter of law, beyond a reasonable doubt, warranted a jury in finding that defendant was possessed of that requisite “felonious intent” which is an essential ingredient of the crime of larceny. We hold the evidence insufficient and reverse the judgment of conviction.

Defendant-appellant, Alan Erwin, was tried before a jury on a charge of grand larceny, under the provisions of I.C. § 18-4604(3).1 Erwin, a rancher for all of his life, moved in December of 1973 from Gooding County to Owyhee County where he…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Curley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
  4. United States v. Peter Reuben OrtizCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
  5. Donald Dean Lewis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. State v. SheahanIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. PizzutoIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. FenleyIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. State v. WageniusIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  5. State v. BabbIdaho Supreme Court · 1994

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API