Legal Opinion

Dillard v. Ceaser

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 4, 1952No. 34565PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs in error will be referred to herein as Dillard and Hilliard, respectively, or, when referred to jointly, as defendants. Defendant in error will be referred to as Ceaser.

Ceaser and Dillard entered into a written contract on September 5, 1944, whereunder Dillard agreed to sell, and Ceaser to buy, a portion of two city lots, improved with a dwelling house, in the city of Sapulpa, for the consideration of $800, payable $150 in cash and the balance in monthly installments of $15 each, with interest on the unpaid balance at 6 per cent per annum. Upon full payment, Ceaser was to get a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dillon v. RinglemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Palovik v. AbsherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  3. Bell v. ProtheroeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  4. Harrell v. ClarkeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Craig v. ChisholmSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kirkland v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
  2. Dang v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  3. Basden v. MillsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  4. Martin v. MaldonadoAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Cahoon v. CahoonUtah Supreme Court · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API