Legal Opinion

Craig v. Chisholm

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 22, 1938No. 26953PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

The parties to this appeal on June 9, 1934, entered into a contract by which the plaintiff in error, E. F. Craig, agreed to sell certain real estate to Mrs. Bertha Chisholm. Mrs. Chisholm contended that she properly tendered performance of the contract, and, when Craig refused to convey, brought suit and obtained a 'decree for specific performance. Craig is appealing from that decree.

The contract is in writing. The essential terms thereof provide that Craig contracted and agreed with Mrs. Chisholm to sell and convey to her certain real estate “for consideration of $10,000 to be paid in the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Fraser v. JarrettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  2. Standard Lumber Co. v. Miller & Vidor Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. Baker v. HowisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  4. Machold v. FarnanIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Nelson v. HamraSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dillard v. CeaserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  2. Palovik v. AbsherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  3. Dean Harr & Co. v. KuhlmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  4. Cullen v. TolleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API