Legal Opinion

Palovik v. Absher

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 13, 1947No. 32682PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOsborn, J.

This is an action for the specific performance of a contract for the sale of real estate, brought by plaintiffs, Henry J. Absher and Maurine Absher, against defendants, Joe Palovik and Marie Palovik. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendants appeal.

There is no substantial dispute as to the essential facts. Defendants were the owners of a small tract of land with a house thereon near the city of Still-water, and listed the same for sale with an agent named Clingenpeel. Clingen-peel sold this property to plaintiffs under a written contract for the sum of $2,000, in which was included the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Mounts v. Boardman Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Rosser-Moon Furniture Co. v. Oklahoma State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  3. Simmons v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Continental Supply Co. v. Sinclair Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Moore v. KellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Master Commodities, Inc. v. Texas Cattle Management Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
  2. Palmer v. Crews Lumber Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
  3. Alfrey v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  4. Dillard v. CeaserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  5. Finnell v. JavineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API