Legal Opinion

Pillette v. Berghuis

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided June 19, 2009No. Civil 2:06-14511PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

ARTHUR J. TARNOW, District Judge.

Jessie Wayne Pillette, (“Petitioner”), filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In his petition, petitioner challenges his conviction by a jury for assault with intent to commit murder, M.C.L.A. 750.83; two counts of felonious assault, M.C.L.A. 750.82; and three counts of carrying a weapon with unlawful' intent, M.C.L.A. 750.226. Because petitioner was denied the effective assistance of trial counsel by counsel’s failure to call favorable witnesses, the petition…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Strayhorn v. BookerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010
  2. Daniel v. PalmerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010
  3. Pillette v. BerghuisDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2009
  4. Pillette v. BerghuisDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2009
  5. Bennett v. ChristiansenDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API