Legal Opinion

BURNAM v. CAPOZZA

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 4, 2020No. 2:20-cv-01800Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JEROME BURNAM, ) ) 20-cv-1800 Petitioner, ) ) ELECTRONICALLY FILED v. ) ) MARK V. CAPOZZA, Superintendent of ) the State Correctional Institution at ) Fayette, ) Respondent. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION DENYING “PETITION TO REOPEN HABEAS PROCEEDING VIA RULE 60(B)(5) & (6) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE” (Doc. No. 1) Pending before the Court is Petitioner Jerome Burnam’s “Petition to Reopen Habeas Proceeding via Rule 60(b)(5) & (6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.” (Doc. No. 1). For the reasons that follow,…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Gonzalez v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Woodford v. VisciottiSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API