Legal Opinion

Davis v. Department of Indus. Relations

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided November 7, 1984No. Civ. 4337PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an unemployment compensation case.

After an ore tenus hearing, the trial court determined that the claimant was not entitled to unemployment compensation benefits. The trial court's decision was in part based on the conclusion that the claimant was discharged from his employment with the Mobile County Personnel Board because of misconduct in connection with his employment after previous warnings.

The claimant appeals and we affirm.

The dispositive issues are whether the trial court erred regarding a certain evidentiary ruling and whether the trial court's decision, that the claimant was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. STATE DEPT. OF INDUS. RELATIONS v. PageCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1978
  2. STATE, DEPT. OF INDUS. RELATIONS v. DowneyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1980
  3. Williams v. JamesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  4. Zekoff v. FranklinCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1979

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Debra L. MITCHELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HUMANA HOSPITAL-SHOALS, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
  2. Fugate v. State Dept. of Indus. RelationsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  3. Hale v. Hyundai Motor Manufacturing Alabama, LLCCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012
  4. Rudy v. Walter Coke, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2014
  5. Rubin v. Department of Industrial RelationsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API