Martin v. Bd. of Comm. of St. Improv. Dist. No. 5
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.
Street Improvement District No. 5 of the city of Stuttgart, Arkansas, was organized under provisions of act No. 84 of the General Assembly of the year of 1881, and the several amendatory acts as found in §§ 5647 to 5701, inclusive, Crawford & Moses’ Digest. Assessments on each tract, lot and parcel of land, within the district, were duly and legally made. The property involved in this suit is lot thirteen and the south half of lot twelve, block eleven of Union Addition to the city of Stuttgart, belonging to M. F. Elms, who is the real appellant and party in interest herein.
Within the time…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- W. B. Worthen Co. v. KavanaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- New Netherlands American Mortgage Bank, Ltd. v. Little Red River Levee District No. 1Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
3Cited by6 opinions
- Whitaker & Co. v. Sewer Improvement District No. 1Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
- Street Improvement District No. 113 of Hot Springs v. MooneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
- Ingram v. Board of Commissioners of Street Improvement District No. 5Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
- Lueken v. BurchSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
- City of Eureka Springs v. BanksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.