Street Improvement District No. 113 of Hot Springs v. Mooney
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin Smith, C. J.
Ed B. Mooney sued Street Improvement District No. 113, of Hot Springs, and its commissioners, 1 alleging that he, as the contractor whose bid for making certain improvements was accepted, was given a certificate of indebtedness for $3,000 representing final payment. Seven credits extended from September, 1931, to September, 1937,-aggregating $1,349.50, were set out in the complaint, leaving a balance of $2,836.79 as of October 1, 1937. The certificate bore interest at the rate of six per cent, per annum. It was dated December 14, 1930, and was due a year later. Appellee’s suit was filed’…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Shepherd v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Belcher v. Tacoma Eastern RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
- Morris v. CarrSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
- Buchanan v. HalpinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Greer v. BlockerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
- Lueken v. BurchSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
- McMahon v. O'KeefeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
- Blake v. Commercial Factors Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
- Buss v. CooleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.