Legal Opinion

Ingram v. Board of Commissioners of Street Improvement District No. 5

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 19, 1938No. 4-5297PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Street Improvement District No. 5 of the city of Stuttgart was regularly and properly organized in 1916 to improve certain streets in that city. The ordinance levying assessments of benefits was passed August 7, 1916. Money was borrowed by the district to pay for the improvement, bonds were executed and sold and the assessments pledged for the payment thereof.

The district’s commissioners filed suit in its own name on October 5, 1934, to enforce payment of certain delinquent assessments. The town lots of appellant Ingram were included in this suit. At the time the district was formed Ingram…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kirst v. Street Improvement District No. 120Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
  2. Chicago Mill & Lumber Co. v. Drainage District No. 17Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  3. Paving District No. 5 v. FernandezSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  4. Arkansas-Louisiana Highway Improvement District v. PickensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  5. Thibault v. McHaneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Eureka Springs v. BanksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  2. Papa v. Kitchens, SheriffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
  3. Lancaster v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
  4. White v. Board of Comm. of Street Imp. Dist. No. 2Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  5. White v. Board of Comm. of Street Imp. Dist. No. 2Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API