Legal Opinion

Belt v. Cole

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1983No. 15674, 15675 and 15866PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARSHBARGER, Justice:

These cases have been consolidated to determine the applicability of eligibility and disqualification provisions in our unemployment compensation act to striking workers without a contract, a question of statutory interpretation that does not require factual exposition.

All appeals stem from findings that striking workers are unable to meet the eligibility requirements in our unemployment compensation act, and therefore, are never entitled to benefits while on strike.

The statute includes both eligibility and disqualification provisions. W.Va.Code, 21A-6-1 and 21A-6-3.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Smith v. State Workmen's Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Lee-Norse Co. v. RutledgeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State ex rel. Hardesty v. Aracoma—Chief Logan No. 4523West Virginia Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Inter-Island Resorts, Ltd. v. AkahaneHawaii Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Kisamore v. RutledgeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lough v. ColeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Perfin v. ColeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Smittle v. GatsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Belt v. RutledgeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Gordon v. RutledgeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API