Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1975No. 43225PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinley, J.

This is an action to determine whether plaintiff Wilson is entitled to pension benefits, paid and to be paid, at rates which due to defendant’s error in computation are in excess of the benefits to which plaintiff is entitled by the actual terms of the pension plan. Defendant Westinghouse sought to recover all overages paid. The trial court held, essentially upon an estoppel theory, that Westinghouse (1) was not entitled to recover the overages already paid, and (2) must continue to pay the pension benefits at the higher rate. The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s judgment that the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kessinger v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Shafer v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Dorward v. ILWU-PMA PENSION PLANWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Thorsteinson v. WatersWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Keierleber v. BottingWashington Supreme Court · 1970

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Lybbert v. Grant CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. YatesWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. YatesWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Kramarevcky v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Silverstreak, Inc. v. STATE DEPT. OF LABORWashington Supreme Court · 2007

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API