Barber v. Rochester
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.
Appellants, plaintiffs below, sued the respondents for the rescission of a sale or exchange of properties. Many of the thirty-five assignments of error are directed to the findings of fact, but, because the case must be reversed for the exclusion of evidence, a decision on those assignments would be premature.
Appellants owned an automobile repair business, the real property on which it was conducted, and a home. Respondents had a similar business, the real property on which it was conducted, and a written contract (franchise) with the manufacturer for the retail sale of Plymouth and Chrysler…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Smith v. KirkpatrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Rinaudo v. BloomCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
- Bond v. WiegardtWashington Supreme Court · 1950
- Andersonian Investment Co. v. WadeWashington Supreme Court · 1919
- McGregor v. First Farmers-Merchants Bank & Trust Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1935
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Hamilton v. WosepkaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
- Crown Controls, Inc. v. SmileyWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Emrich v. ConnellWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Hansen v. WightmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
- Wright v. DAVE JOHNSON INS. INC.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2012
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.