Legal Opinion

Juzefski v. Western Casualty & Surety Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 19, 1959No. Civ. 23789PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFox, P. J.

This case involves the interpretation of the provisions of an automobile insurance policy extending coverage, with certain exclusions, to accidents occurring while the insured is driving a car other than his own. The trial court held that the coverage of the policy did not extend to the accident in question. From such adverse judgment plaintiff has appealed.

Seymour A. Keyes was the owner in November, 1955, of a Chevrolet car which was insured with defendant. While driving his father’s Packard he was involved in an accident with the plaintiff. The father had insurance coverage on the Packard…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Arenson v. National Automobile & Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Osborne v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. PrayCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
  5. City of Santa Monica v. Royal Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1958

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Dairyland Insurance v. WardWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Simon v. Milwaukee Automobile Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  3. Kenney v. Employees' Liability Assurance Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Kenilworth Insurance Co. v. ColeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Highlands Ins. Co. v. UNIVERSAL UNDERWRITERS INS.California Court of Appeal · 1979

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API