Legal Opinion

Pacific Automobile Insurance v. Lewis

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 11, 1943No. Civ. 2872PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

This is an action for declaratory relief for the purpose of interpreting certain insurance contracts and determining which policies covered the defendants in a previous personal injury action. The court found that the automobile in question was not furnished to the respondent H. E. Wells for his regular use within the meaning of clauses in policies issued by The Mercer Casualty Company and Pacific Automobile Insurance Company, respectively, and held that these policies afforded coverage to Wells for the liability in question, and that such liability was to be borne proportionately by these…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Narver v. California State Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Kindred v. Pacific Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Di Orio v. New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  2. Aler v. Travelers Indemnity Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1950
  3. Leteff v. Maryland Casualty CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. SmithSupreme Court of Virginia · 1965
  5. Farm Bureau Mutual Automobile Insurance v. MarrDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1955

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API