Legal Opinion
Holman v. Cross
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 7, 1935No. 6616PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONS, Circuit Judge.
The receiver of a national bank sought to recover from officers and directors losses on loans on the ground that they were made in violation of statutes, or negligently and improvidently. Reference to a master resulted in a report of substantial liability, based upon findings of fact and conclusions of law, to which the defendants Cross and Moore excepted, and which were in many respects set aside, and in some respects sustained, by the District Judge on review. An appeal by the receiver followed.
Cross was president, Moore, cashier, and both directors of the First…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Briggs v. SpauldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Corsicana Nat. Bank of Corsicana v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Ex Parte Public National Bank of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. ConartySupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Lang v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Michelsen v. PenneyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- First National Bank of Lincolnwood v. KellerDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1970
- Salt Lake County v. Utah Copper Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937
- Brown Leasing Company, Formerly Known as Capital Leasing Company v. Cosmopolitan Bancorp, Incorporated, Gerald J. Denicholas, James WellsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Michelsen v. PenneyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1941
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.