Legal Opinion
Michelsen v. Penney
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 6, 1941PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KNOX, District Judge.
This case is before me upon exceptions filed to the findings and conclusions of the Special Master herein.
The suit is of major importance. The record consists of more than 8,000 pages of testimony, and this is supplemented by hundreds of exhibits. The Master’s opinion and report occupy 331 printed pages. The exceptions thereto are supported by many briefs of excessive length, with the result that they have tended to confuse rather than clarify the exceedingly intricate questions that are here involved. Much as I dislike to increase the length of the record, there seems to…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- United States v. HutchesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Keifer & Keifer v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1908
- Van Beeck v. Sabine Towing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Corsicana Nat. Bank of Corsicana v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Michelsen v. PenneyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- International Railways of Central America v. United Fruit CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Michelsen v. PenneyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943