Saala v. McFarland
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.
Plaintiff Esther Saala appeals from a summary judgment in favor of respondent Maurine McFarland in an action to recover for personal injuries sustained when struck by defendant’s automobile on a parking lot maintained by the parties’ common employer. Even though plaintiff properly received workmen’s compensation benefits since her injury was one “arising out of and in the course of the employment” (Lab. Code, § 3600), summary judgment must be reversed because the trial court erred in concluding that the provisions of section 3601 of that code barred any recovery from defendant coemployee in…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Baugh v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Pleasant Valley Lima Bean Growers & Warehouse Ass'n v. Cal-Farm InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- California Casualty Indemnity Exchange v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Cal. Cas. Ind. Exch. v. Industrial Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1943
- Meyer v. BlackmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Hinman v. Westinghouse Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1970
- Johns-Manville Products Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Hendy v. LosseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Torres v. Parkhouse Tire Service, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Dimmig v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.