Legal Opinion

Finn Bros. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided October 8, 1970No. C.D. 4085PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RoseNSteiN, Judge:

This case concerns the proper tariff classification and rate of duty for certain items described on the entry papers as “carved ivory rose flowers.” However, there is a collateral issue which must be considered before proceeding to a decision on the merits.

The merchandise was entered for consumption on November 19, 1965 under TSUS item 740.35, and estimated duties, based on a 55 per centum ad valorem duty rate, were deposited. Although the case was tried (R. 3) and briefed by the parties on the assumption that the merchandise was classified as entered, it was, in fact,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. Doragon Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  2. United States v. FloryCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  3. United States v. Cartier (Inc.)Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  4. Rink v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  5. United States v. International Forwarding Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Finn Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
  2. Finn Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API