Legal Opinion

United States v. Cartier (Inc.)

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 5, 1927No. 2926; No. 2927PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge

Merchandise in chief value of platinum was classified by the ■collector of customs at the port of New York as unfinished jewelry *335and assessed for duty at 80 per centum ad valorem under that part of paragraph 1428 of the Tariff Act of 1922 which reads as follows:

1428. Jewelry, commonly or commercially so known, finished or unfinished, of whatever material composed, valued above 20 cents per dozen pieces, 80 per centum ad valorem; * * * (Italics not quoted.)

The importer claimed that the merchandise was dutiable either at 60 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 399 as an article in chief value…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mamluck v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Paramount Import Export Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
  2. Harding Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936
  3. Pan American Airways, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1946
  4. Dollar Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  5. Finn Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API