United States v. Cartier (Inc.)
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge
Merchandise in chief value of platinum was classified by the ■collector of customs at the port of New York as unfinished jewelry *335and assessed for duty at 80 per centum ad valorem under that part of paragraph 1428 of the Tariff Act of 1922 which reads as follows:
1428. Jewelry, commonly or commercially so known, finished or unfinished, of whatever material composed, valued above 20 cents per dozen pieces, 80 per centum ad valorem; * * * (Italics not quoted.)
The importer claimed that the merchandise was dutiable either at 60 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 399 as an article in chief value…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Mamluck v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
3Cited by23 opinions
- Paramount Import Export Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
- Harding Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936
- Pan American Airways, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1946
- Dollar Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
- Finn Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.