Legal Opinion

Ward v. Tilly's, Inc.

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided February 4, 2019No. B280151PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmon, P. J.

*1170This appeal, which follows an order sustaining a demurrer without leave to amend, concerns the practice of on-call scheduling. As alleged, on-call scheduling works this way: Employees are assigned on-call shifts, but are not told until they call in two hours before their shifts start whether they should actually come in to work. If they are told to come in, they are paid for the shifts; if not, they do not receive any compensation for having been "on call."

Plaintiff Skylar Ward challenges the on-call scheduling practices of her former employer, Tilly's, Inc. (Tilly's), as violating wage order…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Martinez v. CombsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Murphy v. Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Ass'n v. City of La HabraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Carman v. AlvordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Alexia Herrera v. Zumiez, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  2. Summers v. Colette, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  3. Bradford v. Chevron USA Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2019
  4. DiMercurio v. Equilon Enterprises LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
  5. DiMercurio v. Equilon Enterprises LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API