Legal Opinion
Perry v. Crawford Company
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided October 13, 1983No. 83CA0214PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN CISE, Judge.
Claimant, Ronald G. Perry, seeks review of a final order of the Industrial Commission denying his claim for workmen’s compensation benefits. We affirm.
The pertinent facts are undisputed. Claimant was employed as an accounts manager by Crawford and Company and worked in the Inverness Park industrial park. His normal work hours were from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., and he was paid for forty hours of work a week. He was free to do what' he wanted at lunchtime. There was no place in his office building to purchase lunch, so he had the options of bringing lunch, going out to eat, or not…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Berry's Coffee Shop, Inc. v. PalombaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
- Industrial Commission v. Golden Cycle CorporationSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
- Employers Mutual Insurance v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924
- JC Carlile Corporation v. AntakiSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
- Waycott v. Beneficial Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Quest. Sub. by US Ct. of AppealsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Varsity Contractors & Home Insurance Co. v. BacaColorado Court of Appeals · 1985
- Stamper v. HiteshewColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
- Tolbert v. Martin Marietta Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Varsity Contractors & Home Insurance Co. v. BacaColorado Court of Appeals · 1985