Legal Opinion

Stamper v. Hiteshew

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided April 12, 1990No. 89CA0476PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge PIERCE.

Plaintiff, Beth A. Stamper, appeals that part of the summary judgment dismissing her state claims as barred by the exclusivity provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act), § 8-40-101, et seq., C.R.S. (1986 Repl.Vol. 3B). We reverse.

This action arises from plaintiff’s employment with Colorado Springs Optical Company, a company owned by defendant, Donald Hiteshew. In her complaint, plaintiff asserts that Hiteshew, as her employer, personally engaged in acts of sexual harassment, sexual discrimination, wrongful and constructive discharge, civil assault and battery,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Quest. Sub. by US Ct. of AppealsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  2. Deterts v. Times Publishing CompanyColorado Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Irwin v. Industrial CommissionColorado Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Perry v. Crawford CompanyColorado Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Green v. Wyman-Gordon Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  2. Popovich v. IrlandoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  3. Horodyskyj v. KaranianSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  4. Mass v. Martin Marietta Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 1992
  5. Anderson v. Save-A-Lot, Ltd.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API