Legal Opinion
United States v. Victor Guy Johnson
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 28, 1999No. 99-30045PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:
This case concerns the Interstate Agreement on Detainers (“IAD”), 18 U.S.C.App. 2, and what starts the clock running on a prisoner’s demand for a speedy trial. Appellant Victor Guy Johnson was serving a term in a Washington state prison when the United States Attorney for Oregon filed a federal complaint against him for an unrelated crime. The U.S. Attorney had the U.S. Marshal’s Service serve a detain-er for Johnson on the Washington authorities. Johnson filled out the speedy trial demand form that the Marshal’s Service served on him and gave it to the appropriate…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fex v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kevin James COLLINS, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Paredes-BatistaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Sammy Lee Ward, Edward B. Prows, A/K/A TeddyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- Steven J. Casper, M-8294 v. Joseph Ryan, and the Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania, and the District Attorney for Philadelphia CountyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- United States v. Tommy E. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Jeffrey Sale Lualemaga, AKA Jeffrey SaleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Singh v. ClintonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- State v. PeroNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
- Peterson v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2003
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.