Legal Opinion

Spencer v. Patton

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 1934No. 25013. Department TwoPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

Hespondent commenced this action to collect certain unpaid rental for the premises described in a written lease and for the reformation of the written lease so as to correctly describe the demised premises as set forth in the complaint.

Appellants answered, denying various allegations of the complaint, and as an affirmative defense alleged that the lease was executed on August 27, 1931; that the description of the property in the lease was the correct description of the property leased By them; that, after making the lease, they were in possession of all the premises therein described; that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dennis v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Chapman v. MillikenWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Moore v. ParkerWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Hapeman v. McNealWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Stubbe v. StanglerWashington Supreme Court · 1930

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. Northwest Magnesite Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Geoghegan v. DeverWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Marks v. Mike Scaler's, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Sibbald v. Chehalis Savings & Loan Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Kelley v. Von HerbergWashington Supreme Court · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API