Legal Opinion

Sibbald v. Chehalis Savings & Loan Ass'n

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1940No. 28171PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

The complaint in this case contains two causes of action, separately stated. By the first, it is sought to recover what is claimed to be an overpayment of interest upon a promissory note. The second cause of action was dismissed by stipulation of the parties. The case was tried before the court without a jury, and, after the trial was concluded, the court wrote a memorandum decision in which it expressed the view that the plaintiffs were not entitled to recover, and also stated that there was five dollars due the plaintiffs by reason of an overcharge of interest. The same statement as to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kedziora v. Washington Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Dowler v. Georgia Enterprises, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Spencer v. PattonWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Puget Sound MacHinery Depot v. GranstonWashington Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. Northwest Magnesite Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Anderson v. Gold Seal Vineyards, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Patterson v. BixbyWashington Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Sherman v. Western Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API