Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Massengale

Per Curigm.

The board found that petitioner had not complied with our 1961 order “to desist and refrain from the practice of law, in any form, from this day forward * * *,” and had failed to establish by clear and convincing evidence that he is a proper person to be readmitted to the practice of law or that he possesses all the mental and educational qualifications that were required for his original admission to the bar. We agree and hereby deny petitioner’s petition for reinstatement.

Under Gov. Bar R. V(28):

“Requisites for Reinstatement. No person shall be reinstated unless he or she…