Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Rose v. Lorain County Board of Elections

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 2000No. 00-1593PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.

Relators assert that they are entitled to the requested extraordinary relief in mandamus to compel the board of elections and the township to place the referendum issue on the November 7 election ballot. Relators contend that the board of elections abused its discretion and disregarded applicable law by refusing to place the referendum issue on the November 7 election ballot. According to relators, Rose had a common-law right to withdraw his first and second petitions and resubmit them as one petition.

We are cognizant that “[t]he initiative and referendum powers are hereby reserved to the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Christy v. Summit County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Markus v. Trumbull County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  3. State Ex Rel. Sharpe v. HittOhio Supreme Court · 1951
  4. State ex rel. Senn v. Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  5. In re Election Contest of Democratic Primary ElectionOhio Supreme Court · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Colbert v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State ex rel. Steele v. MorrisseyOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State ex rel. Choices for South-Western City Schools v. AnthonyOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State ex rel. Ditmars v. McSweeneyOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. BuehlerOhio Supreme Court · 2007

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API