Legal Opinion
In Re Application of Luna
California Supreme Court
Decided June 17, 1927No. Docket No. Crim. 2999PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.
Petitioner was convicted in the superior court of the county of Los Angeles for a violation of the statute known as the Wright Act (Stats. 1921, p. 79) (a high misdemeanor). He seeks his discharge through habeas corpus upon the ground that jurisdiction of said offense has been divested out of the superior court and invested exclusively in the municipal courts of said county.
Upon this identical conviction petitioner sought his discharge from the district court of appeal, second appellate district, division two. Said matter was heard by that court in conjunction with a similar case and opinion…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Green v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- In Re KasterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Bakkenson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Graham v. Mayor & Bd. of Trs. of FresnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Matter of Application of WestenbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- In Re McKinneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Villanazul v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Hopkins v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- People v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- People v. WinchellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.