Legal Opinion
Clark v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided December 19, 2003No. CIV.A. 00B1841PACPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER
BABCOCK, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff Ricky Eugene Clark brings claims for reformation of contract, breach of contract-failure to pay PIP benefits, breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing, and willful and wanton breach of contract against Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”). The claims revolve around a July 18, 1996 incident in which Mr. Clark, a pedestrian, was struck by a car driven by Monica Madrid. The car was owned and insured by Monica Madrid’s grandmother, Hortencia Madrid (“Mrs. Madrid”).
On June 19,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Martin Marietta Corp. v. LorenzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. McMichaelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hill v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Clark v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Clark v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Folks v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- Breaux v. American Family Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.