Legal Opinion
Clark v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 30, 2005No. 04-1022, 04-1023PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HENRY, Circuit Judge.
On July 18, 1996, an automobile insured by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”) struck Ricky Eugene Clark, a pedestrian. Mr. Clark filed a class-action suit against State Farm to collect extended personal injury protection (“PIP”) benefits under the Colorado Auto Accident Reparations Act (“CAARA”). See Colo.Rev.Stat. §§ l(Mr-701 to 10-4-726 (2002). 1 He alleged that the driver’s Pedestrian Limitation policy from State Farm did not conform to CAARA and that Brennan v. Farmers Alliance Mutual Insurance Co., 961 P.2d 550 (Colo.Ct.App.1998) entitled…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ralston v. Smith & Nephew Richards, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Davoll v. WebbCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Davis v. MinetaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Blanke v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Lantec, Inc. v. Novell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Champagne Metals v. Ken-Mac Metals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Hill v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. BoellstorffCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Haynes Trane Service Agency, Inc. v. American Standard, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Shotts v. GEICOCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.