Legal Opinion

People v. Campbell

Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California

Decided August 28, 1930No. Cr. A. No. 439PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, Acting P. J.

Defendant was charged with two violations of the Usury Law (Stats. 1919, p. lxxxiii) in separate counts of the same complaint, was convicted on both counts and appeals from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial. The charging part of each count alleges that the defendant did “ask and demand, receive, take, accept and charge” interest on a loan at a rate greater than twelve per cent per annum.

At the trial it was stipulated that the complaining witness, one Melton, executed two promissory notes, on which the two counts of the complaint are based, and which were…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Haines v. Commercial Mortgage Co.California Supreme Court · 1927
  2. State v. RossOregon Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Wallace v. ZinmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Baender v. BarnettSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. Otis v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty.California Supreme Court · 1905

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Miskovich v. City of HelenaMontana Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Miskovich v. City of HelenaMontana Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API