Legal Opinion · Dissent

Tenney v. Seven-Up Co.

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided September 5, 1978No. 3313Published

1DissentSutin, Judge

I dissent.

Evidence little, damages small, issues and law in the court below formless, and the change of position taken on this appeal, proves the inadequacy in the presentation, both in the trial court and on this appeal.

The first count in plaintiffs’ complaint proceeded on the strict liability theory that a bottle of 7-Up was in an unwholesome condition, unreasonably dangerous. The second count proceeded on the theory of negligence. During the trial plaintiffs abandoned their claim of negligence without explanation. Plaintiffs’ attorney apparently overlooked the New Mexico Food Act, §…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Shoshone Coca-Cola Bottling Company v. DolinskiNevada Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Tafoya v. Las Cruces Coca-Cola Bottling CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Allen v. COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY, INC.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1966
  4. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Plainview v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  5. Slonsky v. Phoenix Coca-Cola Bottling CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API