Legal Opinion

Slonsky v. Phoenix Coca-Cola Bottling Company

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 18, 1972No. 1 CA-CIV 1812PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HATHAWAY, Judge.

Appellants, plaintiffs in the superior court, brought a tort action against the appellee bottling company. The action resulted from plaintiff Lillian Slonsky’s consumption of a soft drink which allegedly contained foreign material, including metallic filings. The action came to trial before a jury and the court directed a verdict in favor of appellee-defendant at the end of the plaintiffs’ case. The defendant contended (1) that the evidence was insufficient on the issue of whether there had been tampering or reasonable opportunity for tampering; (2) that there was no evidence…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. OS Stapley Company v. MillerArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Davis v. WeberArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Nalbandian v. Byron Jackson Pumps, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Crystal Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. CatheyArizona Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Jackson v. Cushing Coca-Cola Bottling CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hymer v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  2. Tenney v. Seven-Up Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Tenney v. Seven-Up Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API