Choice v. Pennsylvania Board of Parole
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
NEALON, Chief Judge.
Petitioner, Robert Lee Choice, filed this habeas corpus action contending that respondent, the Pennsylvania Board of Parole, unlawfully extended his maximum sentence by revoking his parole and taking away his “street time.” Respondent filed a motion to dismiss and a memorandum of law in support thereof. After having had his attention twice directed to Local Rule of Court 301.01, petitioner filed a “traverse” in opposition to the motion to dismiss. Both parties have filed briefs and supplemental briefs on the exhaustion of state remedies issue. Respondent has…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Brown v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. DormanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Almeida v. JeffesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
- Camacho v. Commonwealth of Puerto RicoDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2004
- Moore v. FulcomerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
- Ross v. FulcomerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.