Legal Opinion
Ross v. Fulcomer
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 1, 1985No. Civ. A. No. 84-5774PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*561MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
RAYMOND J. BRODERICK, District Judge.
Petitioner Samuel Ross, currently confined at the State Correctional Institution at Huntingdon, Pennsylvania, has filed this pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. United States Magistrate Peter B. Scuderi, to whom the petition was referred for a report and recommendation, has recommended dismissing the petition for failure to exhaust state remedies. Ross has objected to Magistrate Scuderi’s report and recommendation, contending that he has exhausted his state remedies and requesting a determination of…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Baker v. DrabikNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
- Morin v. LopesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1986