Legal Opinion
Moore v. Fulcomer
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 10, 1985No. Civ. A. 84-5036PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
LOUIS H. POLLAK, District Judge.
In a Memorandum dated February 5, 1985, I determined that petitioner in this habeas corpus proceeding had exhausted all appropriate state remedies. Accordingly, I remanded the case to United States Magistrate William F. Hall, Jr. for consideration of the merits of the petition. Soon thereafter, the District Attorney of Philadelphia, one of the respondents herein, moved for reconsideration of my ruling on the question of exhaustion. Petitioner has not replied to that motion for reconsideration.
Petitioner was convicted in the Court of Common Pleas for…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Brown v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Gennero Galtieri v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections, John Matera v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Pitchess v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Albert H. Carter v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bond v. FulcomerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Bond v. FulcomerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989